You may have read my previous post wherein I mentioned that the Eleventh Circuit has finally ruled that Florida’s death penalty statute is constitutional. See Evans v. Sec‘y, Dept. of Corrections, No. 11-14498 (opinion issued October 23, 2012). Well, now what can Evans do?
Only Evans and his criminal appeals lawyers know for certain what will happen next, but any appellate attorney knows that Evans generally has 3 options: (1) do nothing; (2) seek rehearing in the court of appeals; or, (3) seek discretionary review in the United States Supreme Court. If he is going to try to seek rehearing in the Eleventh Circuit or discretionary review in the United States Supreme Court, he’ll have to act quickly.
A motion for rehearing in the Eleventh Circuit (“Petition for Panel Rehearing”) will have to be filed within 14 days after the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 40. The Federal Rules of Appellate procedure can be found on the website for the Eleventh Circuit by clicking here.
If Evans decides to seek review in the United States Supreme Court, United States Supreme Court Rule 13 provides that a party seeking to file a petition for writ of certiorari will have to file the petition within 90 days after the entry of judgment. Rule 13.3 further provides that the 90 days begins to run from the date of the entry of the judgment, not the date mandate issues. If rehearing is sought in the lower appellate court, the 90 days begins to run from the date of the denial of rehearing or, if rehearing is granted, the subsequent entry of judgment. The Rules of the United States Supreme Court may be viewed here.
Put simply, seeking discretionary review in the United States Supreme Court is a long shot. For an interesting article on seeking review in the Supreme Court, view an article posted on the Mayer Brown website by clicking here.
And now the next round of waiting begins . . .