United States Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Kaley v. United States, 12-464: Government’s Use of Pre-Trial Asset Seizure and the Right to Counsel of Choice
Federal criminal trial and criminal appeals attorneys who follow this blog might remember that the US Supreme Court accepted cert in the case of Kaley v. United States, No. 12-464, a federal criminal case which arose from our very own Southern District of Florida. (You can read my previous post here.)
Well, on October 16, 2013, the Court heard oral argument in the case, and if the Court’s questions posed during oral argument are any indicator, the case may be too close to call. You can read the transcripts of the argument by clicking here. If you prefer the audio recording, click here.
I don’t know about you, but I find this case extremely compelling because it so heavily impacts a defendant’s right to counsel of choice. That the Government is permitted, by statute, to freeze the assets of a criminal defendant pre-trial, based only on a grand jury indictment, and that the defendant is not permitted to challenge to the evidentiary basis for Government’s asset freeze, is just astounding. We’ll just have to wait and see what the Court decides, but when the opinion is issued, I know I’ll be looking for the magic word “reversed.”